Happy July 4th!  If you are going out to the beach on this holiday, throwing on a bathing suit…don’t fret.  We’re all so used to seeing women with no thighs or bums in bathing suits on magazine covers but maybe that’s because  their thighs are airbrushed out?  Well, not always.  But thousands are claiming Victoria’s Secret did that in this middle photo.  Victoria’s Secret appears to have thinned out a model’s upper legs, and completely erased her bum. The new ad, for the lingerie brand’s Swim Style Finder promotion, gives the model the appearance of no inner thighs.  Hmmmm…



  1. Jessie says:

    that actually looks awful, shame shame

  2. Jennifer S. says:

    That doesn’t even look attractive ew! Looks like the body of a 12 year old boy. smh!

  3. April says:

    I’d fire whoever does their PS…bad job all together IMO!!

  4. Christy Nather says:

    Yah I saw this pic several days back and thought it looked awful. Noone looks like that. I knew it was obviously tampered with.

  5. SandyB says:

    Why do they think that looks good?? It looks weird, forget about looking attractive. The other photos look like they left the thighs alone. Why miss with the head-on view? We already know what it looks like.

  6. ShericeJ says:

    Not cute at all, I don’t see why companies insist on changing peoples pictures to try to sell there product.

Leave a Reply

Privacy Policy